<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USPS Confidential?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/05/27/usps-confidential/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/05/27/usps-confidential/</link>
	<description>more from postalnews.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry the Postal Weathman</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/05/27/usps-confidential/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry the Postal Weathman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 15:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/05/27/usps-confidential/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Years ago, someone ran up a utility bill in my name. The utility company had my social security number. The only place someone could have gotten it was off my old-style time card. This was in 1969.

The PO is supposed to stop using SS numbers for routine employee ID, but it's still commonly used on the workroom floor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, someone ran up a utility bill in my name. The utility company had my social security number. The only place someone could have gotten it was off my old-style time card. This was in 1969.</p>
<p>The PO is supposed to stop using SS numbers for routine employee ID, but it&#8217;s still commonly used on the workroom floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
