<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s do the numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/12/01/lets-do-the-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/12/01/lets-do-the-numbers/</link>
	<description>more from postalnews.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard P. Weiss</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/12/01/lets-do-the-numbers/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard P. Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 13:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/12/01/lets-do-the-numbers/#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>I believe the USPS must be conservative in assessing volume figures based on RPW.  RPW sampling can change depending upon the time of year or even the time period during a given month.  POS figures more accurately sum up the distribution of added services and other accountables tracked by RPW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the USPS must be conservative in assessing volume figures based on RPW.  RPW sampling can change depending upon the time of year or even the time period during a given month.  POS figures more accurately sum up the distribution of added services and other accountables tracked by RPW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/12/01/lets-do-the-numbers/#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/12/01/lets-do-the-numbers/#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>Two problems with your comment:

- The 4% increase in revenue was accompanied by a 5% increase in expenses.

- All of the increased revenue was due to the postage increase required to fund the escrow account- none of it is available to the USPS for expenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two problems with your comment:</p>
<p>- The 4% increase in revenue was accompanied by a 5% increase in expenses.</p>
<p>- All of the increased revenue was due to the postage increase required to fund the escrow account- none of it is available to the USPS for expenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKA postal</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/12/01/lets-do-the-numbers/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>AKA postal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/12/01/lets-do-the-numbers/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>Overall a 4% gain in revenue, in a year with increased productivity, and a decrease of 37,000 in the workforce.

I don't think there are too many companies in the world who did that well in 2006 outside of the construction industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall a 4% gain in revenue, in a year with increased productivity, and a decrease of 37,000 in the workforce.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there are too many companies in the world who did that well in 2006 outside of the construction industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
