<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More money than common sense- another wrong way mailbox story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/03/28/more-money-than-common-sense-another-wrong-way-mailbox-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/03/28/more-money-than-common-sense-another-wrong-way-mailbox-story/</link>
	<description>more from postalnews.com</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: southeast</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/03/28/more-money-than-common-sense-another-wrong-way-mailbox-story/comment-page-1/#comment-18813</link>
		<dc:creator>southeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/03/28/more-money-than-common-sense-another-wrong-way-mailbox-story/#comment-18813</guid>
		<description>The spokeswoman for the post office who said it does not matter, in terms of efficiency and safety, which side of the street the box is on  does not know what she is talking about. I does matter , to the postal service, which side of the street the box is on. If the carrier does not have to back track out of a sub division then all the boxes are suppose to go on the right side of the street. Also if the lots are under a certain size (approx 170 ft) then there should be a minimum of two boxes at the property line. This saves time for the carrier, not having to stop at every house . It also looks better in a subdivision with small lots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spokeswoman for the post office who said it does not matter, in terms of efficiency and safety, which side of the street the box is on  does not know what she is talking about. I does matter , to the postal service, which side of the street the box is on. If the carrier does not have to back track out of a sub division then all the boxes are suppose to go on the right side of the street. Also if the lots are under a certain size (approx 170 ft) then there should be a minimum of two boxes at the property line. This saves time for the carrier, not having to stop at every house . It also looks better in a subdivision with small lots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midwest SSA</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/03/28/more-money-than-common-sense-another-wrong-way-mailbox-story/comment-page-1/#comment-15678</link>
		<dc:creator>Midwest SSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/03/28/more-money-than-common-sense-another-wrong-way-mailbox-story/#comment-15678</guid>
		<description>In the followup story in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the couple admitted that they hadn't contacted the Post Office before installing the overpriced mailbox. Hmmm....could have avoided a lot of problems, instead of blaming the Post Office afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the followup story in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the couple admitted that they hadn&#8217;t contacted the Post Office before installing the overpriced mailbox. Hmmm&#8230;.could have avoided a lot of problems, instead of blaming the Post Office afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
