<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USPS won&#8217;t build &#8220;massive&#8221; mail processing facility in Aliso Viejo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/03/usps-wont-build-massive-mail-processing-facility-in-aliso-viejo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/03/usps-wont-build-massive-mail-processing-facility-in-aliso-viejo/</link>
	<description>more from postalnews.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AV Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/03/usps-wont-build-massive-mail-processing-facility-in-aliso-viejo/comment-page-1/#comment-137625</link>
		<dc:creator>AV Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1506#comment-137625</guid>
		<description>The USPS should sell its bare land in Aliso Viejo to make up some badly needed cash.  There is no need for another junk mail processing plant at all as the current system is adequate.  The future is going towards email and 5 day USPS service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USPS should sell its bare land in Aliso Viejo to make up some badly needed cash.  There is no need for another junk mail processing plant at all as the current system is adequate.  The future is going towards email and 5 day USPS service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

