<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USPS Press release on today&#8217;s announcement of organizational changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/</link>
	<description>more from postalnews.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seenoevil</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-132082</link>
		<dc:creator>seenoevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-132082</guid>
		<description>What is your Pension Benefit???

John E. Potter
USPS Pension Benefit
$1,350,318

John E. Potter
CSRS Annuity
30 Years
$2,453,057

H. Glen Walker
FERS Annuity
2 Years
$ 60,702

Patrick R. Donahoe
CSRS Annuity
33 Years
$2,522,570

Anthony J. Vegliante
CSRS Annuity
31 Years
$2,171,701

Mary Anne Gibbons
FERS Annuity
23 Years
$ 815,758</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your Pension Benefit???</p>
<p>John E. Potter<br />
USPS Pension Benefit<br />
$1,350,318</p>
<p>John E. Potter<br />
CSRS Annuity<br />
30 Years<br />
$2,453,057</p>
<p>H. Glen Walker<br />
FERS Annuity<br />
2 Years<br />
$ 60,702</p>
<p>Patrick R. Donahoe<br />
CSRS Annuity<br />
33 Years<br />
$2,522,570</p>
<p>Anthony J. Vegliante<br />
CSRS Annuity<br />
31 Years<br />
$2,171,701</p>
<p>Mary Anne Gibbons<br />
FERS Annuity<br />
23 Years<br />
$ 815,758</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-132053</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-132053</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t they start at the top and cut salaries to people who sit in the office talking on the phone(with their friends) and snacking most of the day.  Our manager said we go to slow.  We need to move faster.  During a snow storm in Cleveland, OH this January she moved her butt in the car and drove around yelling at carriers to go faster and told them they should retire.  When she has 40 years and won&#039;t retire.  Because she sits in an office making 81,000 a year doing nothing but talking on the phone, sits at her desk looking at catalogs for clothing, and pays her (personal) bills, OR shops on the computer for clothing.  And then when her packages arrive from UPS at the window counter the clerks have to accept them.  
I guess if I sat at a desk and didn&#039;t have to lift or push heavy stuff around all day I wouldn&#039;t have to retire either.
She said the clerks have bad work habits.  Some of them are close to her age and they lift and push heavy equipment and know that this is our job and we just keep going.  
But none of us do a job good enough for her.  Even her supervisors don&#039;t do anything right.  I think she won&#039;t retire because she won&#039;t have anyone to yell at anymore.  

I have a great Idea to save money.  They have area Managers.  Then have a station manager be in charge of 2 or 3 stations that are close together.  Then keep the 2 supervisors one for the morning shift and one for the afternoon.  
This would save the Postal Service 160,000 just with 3 stations.  Can&#039;t anyone see this?  Then think of a whole city once they grouped everyone together THINK OF THE SAVINGS THE POSTAL SERVICE WOULD HAVE.  
Then they would not have so much free time to sit on the phone or they could pay their bills at home like everyone else does.  OR SHOP at home!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they start at the top and cut salaries to people who sit in the office talking on the phone(with their friends) and snacking most of the day.  Our manager said we go to slow.  We need to move faster.  During a snow storm in Cleveland, OH this January she moved her butt in the car and drove around yelling at carriers to go faster and told them they should retire.  When she has 40 years and won&#8217;t retire.  Because she sits in an office making 81,000 a year doing nothing but talking on the phone, sits at her desk looking at catalogs for clothing, and pays her (personal) bills, OR shops on the computer for clothing.  And then when her packages arrive from UPS at the window counter the clerks have to accept them.<br />
I guess if I sat at a desk and didn&#8217;t have to lift or push heavy stuff around all day I wouldn&#8217;t have to retire either.<br />
She said the clerks have bad work habits.  Some of them are close to her age and they lift and push heavy equipment and know that this is our job and we just keep going.<br />
But none of us do a job good enough for her.  Even her supervisors don&#8217;t do anything right.  I think she won&#8217;t retire because she won&#8217;t have anyone to yell at anymore.  </p>
<p>I have a great Idea to save money.  They have area Managers.  Then have a station manager be in charge of 2 or 3 stations that are close together.  Then keep the 2 supervisors one for the morning shift and one for the afternoon.<br />
This would save the Postal Service 160,000 just with 3 stations.  Can&#8217;t anyone see this?  Then think of a whole city once they grouped everyone together THINK OF THE SAVINGS THE POSTAL SERVICE WOULD HAVE.<br />
Then they would not have so much free time to sit on the phone or they could pay their bills at home like everyone else does.  OR SHOP at home!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-131980</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-131980</guid>
		<description>Postmaster General&#039;s pay package of $800,000 made for sensational reporting but is NOT true.  But if it were it certainly would be commensurate with the responsibility he has in today&#039;s business climate and CEO compensation.  

I am a craft employee, have been over 26 years, and have seen many employees, both labor and management, who did not deserve the salary they were (and are, in some cases today) drawing.  From the labor side it is the employee who is never moving in a &quot;urgent&quot; mode but just wants to piddle the time away until 8 hrs is met.   From the manager side it can be simply &quot;incompetence&quot; or a misfit who is simply politiically acceptable and should not have been put in management to begin with.

Supervisors at the associate office level today (including the Postmaster) are more administrators than supervisors.  &quot;Higher-ups&quot;  micromanage everything from the District level (or higher).

Much is wrong with the post office.   They could offer some financial incentives (i.e. part of your retirement contributions in a lump sum) and you would see a mass exodus.

Dangle a &quot;carrot&quot; or two and you will see a movement to retire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Postmaster General&#8217;s pay package of $800,000 made for sensational reporting but is NOT true.  But if it were it certainly would be commensurate with the responsibility he has in today&#8217;s business climate and CEO compensation.  </p>
<p>I am a craft employee, have been over 26 years, and have seen many employees, both labor and management, who did not deserve the salary they were (and are, in some cases today) drawing.  From the labor side it is the employee who is never moving in a &#8220;urgent&#8221; mode but just wants to piddle the time away until 8 hrs is met.   From the manager side it can be simply &#8220;incompetence&#8221; or a misfit who is simply politiically acceptable and should not have been put in management to begin with.</p>
<p>Supervisors at the associate office level today (including the Postmaster) are more administrators than supervisors.  &#8220;Higher-ups&#8221;  micromanage everything from the District level (or higher).</p>
<p>Much is wrong with the post office.   They could offer some financial incentives (i.e. part of your retirement contributions in a lump sum) and you would see a mass exodus.</p>
<p>Dangle a &#8220;carrot&#8221; or two and you will see a movement to retire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nalcmember</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-131972</link>
		<dc:creator>nalcmember</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-131972</guid>
		<description>I enjoy reading how much all the postmasters and managers are making as part of their base ... Talk about the need to trim the fat off the giant pig of a post office - this is where we should start</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy reading how much all the postmasters and managers are making as part of their base &#8230; Talk about the need to trim the fat off the giant pig of a post office &#8211; this is where we should start</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nalcmember</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-131971</link>
		<dc:creator>nalcmember</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-131971</guid>
		<description>This is wonderful news ... A slimmer, trimmer, more robust organization that can respond to decreasing marked share and rising costs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is wonderful news &#8230; A slimmer, trimmer, more robust organization that can respond to decreasing marked share and rising costs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothingsound</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-131907</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothingsound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-131907</guid>
		<description>Greg wrote: Oh, by the way, Biblicaly speaking, the “beggining of the end” started right after “Let their be light.”


It&#039;s THERE, you idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg wrote: Oh, by the way, Biblicaly speaking, the “beggining of the end” started right after “Let their be light.”</p>
<p>It&#8217;s THERE, you idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-131897</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-131897</guid>
		<description>To charge for delivery is against the Constitution.  The first thing that needs doing is eliminating management incentive bonuses (aka: Performance Incentive)  If you take a position that was advertised at $60,000.00 a year, why would you expect more?  The Post Master General received salary, benefits package and bonuses totaling $800,000.00 last year.  The President of the United States doesen&#039;t make that much. Oh, by the way, Biblicaly speaking, the &quot;beggining of the end&quot; started right after &quot;Let their be light.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To charge for delivery is against the Constitution.  The first thing that needs doing is eliminating management incentive bonuses (aka: Performance Incentive)  If you take a position that was advertised at $60,000.00 a year, why would you expect more?  The Post Master General received salary, benefits package and bonuses totaling $800,000.00 last year.  The President of the United States doesen&#8217;t make that much. Oh, by the way, Biblicaly speaking, the &#8220;beggining of the end&#8221; started right after &#8220;Let their be light.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OZONE</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-131896</link>
		<dc:creator>OZONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-131896</guid>
		<description>THANK THE CREATION OF COMPUTERS, ROBOTICS AND GREED. ITS GREAT !!!  LOOK HOW MANY  ASSEMBLY LINE JOBS WERE LOST , PHONE OPERATORS, WHATS THAT? MAIL SORTERS VERY FEW NOWADAYS, TOLL COLLECTORS E-Z PASS, SELF CHECKOUT COUNTERS , GAS STATION ATTENDANTS , ATM MACHINES LESS TELLERS NEEDED, MICROWAVES LESS COOKS NEEDED,AND ON AND ON ... BUT WE HAVE CHANGE NOW ,SO EVERYTHING WILL BE O.K. IT WILL BE SOLAR JOBS BUT YOU WONT GET PAID ,IT WILL BE THE ONLY WAY TO GET ELECTRIC BECAUSE EVERYTHING ELSE WILL BE CLOSED DOWN. AND THE BEST OF ALL THE DOLLAR WILL LOSE ALL ITS VALUE SO WHAT WILL ALL THE CROOKED AND GREEDY DO THEN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK THE CREATION OF COMPUTERS, ROBOTICS AND GREED. ITS GREAT !!!  LOOK HOW MANY  ASSEMBLY LINE JOBS WERE LOST , PHONE OPERATORS, WHATS THAT? MAIL SORTERS VERY FEW NOWADAYS, TOLL COLLECTORS E-Z PASS, SELF CHECKOUT COUNTERS , GAS STATION ATTENDANTS , ATM MACHINES LESS TELLERS NEEDED, MICROWAVES LESS COOKS NEEDED,AND ON AND ON &#8230; BUT WE HAVE CHANGE NOW ,SO EVERYTHING WILL BE O.K. IT WILL BE SOLAR JOBS BUT YOU WONT GET PAID ,IT WILL BE THE ONLY WAY TO GET ELECTRIC BECAUSE EVERYTHING ELSE WILL BE CLOSED DOWN. AND THE BEST OF ALL THE DOLLAR WILL LOSE ALL ITS VALUE SO WHAT WILL ALL THE CROOKED AND GREEDY DO THEN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-131894</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-131894</guid>
		<description>THIS IS THE START OF THE END    [ THE BIBLE]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS THE START OF THE END    [ THE BIBLE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/20/usps-press-release-on-todays-announcement-of-organizational-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-131889</link>
		<dc:creator>Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1564#comment-131889</guid>
		<description>I have often argued that the postal service could have headed off at least a part of the problem it is now facing if it would have adopted the same device that many similar natural monopolies in society use to protect their revenue base. It is a well known fact that the postal service is continuing with universal service to an expanding number of delivery addresses, while delivering fewer pieces of mail. Just begin the process of charging a fee to establish initial service for new delivery addresses; say $100.00 per street address. This will effectly pay down the future costs of funding sortation and delivery of mails in the areas of growth. The second suggestion is that we charge for any and all forwarded mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often argued that the postal service could have headed off at least a part of the problem it is now facing if it would have adopted the same device that many similar natural monopolies in society use to protect their revenue base. It is a well known fact that the postal service is continuing with universal service to an expanding number of delivery addresses, while delivering fewer pieces of mail. Just begin the process of charging a fee to establish initial service for new delivery addresses; say $100.00 per street address. This will effectly pay down the future costs of funding sortation and delivery of mails in the areas of growth. The second suggestion is that we charge for any and all forwarded mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

