Comments on: Postal Ponzi Scheme http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/26/the-postal-ponzi-scheme/ more from postalnews.com Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:46:55 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: postalnews blog » Blog Archive » USPS lost $677 million in May: volume down 20% from prior year http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/26/the-postal-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-135596 postalnews blog » Blog Archive » USPS lost $677 million in May: volume down 20% from prior year Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:55:20 +0000 http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1572#comment-135596 [...] profit if it weren’t for the “pre-funding” requirement. We’ve covered this congressional shell game in the past, and the Inspector General’s office has found that even if the pre-funding [...] [...] profit if it weren’t for the “pre-funding” requirement. We’ve covered this congressional shell game in the past, and the Inspector General’s office has found that even if the pre-funding [...]

]]> By: R.S. http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/26/the-postal-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-132168 R.S. Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:02:14 +0000 http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1572#comment-132168 More Gov. trickery! Everyone thought Reagan was a great President but all FERS employees know he screwed them. It's the money game! Since Congress tied bonuses to the TARP program no one wants to borrow. WHY? I guess they really didn't need the money to begin with. So maybe Congress should put the same stipulations with the PO! Long live TEA PARTIES!!! More Gov. trickery! Everyone thought Reagan was a great President but all FERS employees know he screwed them. It’s the money game! Since Congress tied bonuses to the TARP program no one wants to borrow. WHY? I guess they really didn’t need the money to begin with. So maybe Congress should put the same stipulations with the PO! Long live TEA PARTIES!!!

]]> By: brian http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/26/the-postal-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-132164 brian Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:53:15 +0000 http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1572#comment-132164 Bob- any items here that aren't attributed to another source are by the blog owner- me. Click the link for the about page. But why do you call this a "postal hit-piece"? Bob- any items here that aren’t attributed to another source are by the blog owner- me. Click the link for the about page.

But why do you call this a “postal hit-piece”?

]]> By: Bob, Pacific Grove, Ca http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/26/the-postal-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-132147 Bob, Pacific Grove, Ca Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:03:04 +0000 http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1572#comment-132147 And exactly WHO wrote this article?..........I see that there is conveniently no one to give "credit" for writing this postal hit-piece...... And exactly WHO wrote this article?……….I see that there is conveniently no one to give “credit” for writing this postal hit-piece……

]]> By: Evil Tom http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/26/the-postal-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-132136 Evil Tom Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:03:45 +0000 http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1572#comment-132136 Once again the Republicans sticking it to the working people. Keep voting for them and we will all be on public assistance. Once again the Republicans sticking it to the working people. Keep voting for them and we will all be on public assistance.

]]> By: Brian http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/26/the-postal-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-132132 Brian Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:24:22 +0000 http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1572#comment-132132 Welcome to the Roman Empire. Welcome to the Roman Empire.

]]> By: mark http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2009/03/26/the-postal-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-132110 mark Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:31:11 +0000 http://www.postalnewsblog.com/?p=1572#comment-132110 We don't live in an economy, we live in a Ponzi scheme. We don’t live in an economy, we live in a Ponzi scheme.

]]>