<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>postalnews blog &#187; DMM Advisory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalnewsblog.com/category/dmm-advisory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com</link>
	<description>more from postalnews.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Postal Service Seeks Additional Comments on Proposed Mailing Standards</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/01/17/postal-service-seeks-additional-comments-on-proposed-mailing-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/01/17/postal-service-seeks-additional-comments-on-proposed-mailing-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DMM Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/01/17/postal-service-seeks-additional-comments-on-proposed-mailing-standards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January 17, 2007
DMM Advisory
Pricing and Classification — keeping you informed about the prices and mailing standards of the United States Postal Service
Shaping a More Efficient Future
Postal Service Seeks Additional Comments on Proposed Mailing Standards
In today’s Federal Register we update our proposed mailing standards to support our current pricing proposal. We respond to your comments on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name="1102ff7a4969e7c7_OLE_LINK2" /><font face="Arial" color="#666699" size="1"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #666699">January 17, 2007</span></font></p>
<p><strong><em><font face="Arial Black" color="#800000" size="6"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 22pt; color: maroon; font-style: italic">DMM </span></font></em></strong><strong><em><font face="Arial Black" color="#000080" size="6"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 28pt; color: navy; font-style: italic">Advisory</span></font></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><font face="Arial" color="#666699" size="2"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10pt; color: #666699; font-style: italic">Pricing and Classification</span></font></em><font color="#666699"><span style="color: #666699"> —</span></font></strong><font color="#666699" size="1"><span style="font-size: 8pt; color: #666699"> </span></font><font color="#666699" size="1"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #666699">keeping you informed about the prices and mailing standards of the United States Postal Service</span></font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="4"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt">Shaping a More Efficient Future</span></font></strong></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="4"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt">Postal Service Seeks Additional Comments on Proposed Mailing Standards</span></font></strong></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">In </span></font><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-245.htm" target="_blank"><font color="#0000cc" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">today’s</span></font></a><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt"> <em><span style="font-style: italic">Federal Register</span></em> we update our proposed mailing standards to support our current pricing proposal. We respond to your comments on our initial proposal, summarize major changes by class of mail and extra service, and update our summary of the mailing standards. </span></font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10.5pt">Highlights of Revised Mailing Standards</span></font></strong></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10.5pt">Relaxed Standards for Automation Flats</span></font></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 19.5pt; text-indent: -19.5pt"><font face="Wingdings" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Wingdings">§</span></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span style="font-size: 7pt">          </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Relaxed Flexibility Test – now administered by pressing 1 inch from the edge of the piece instead of 1 inch from the edge of the table. This new test is more forgiving of flats with rigid inserts. Typical bound publications and catalogs do not need to be tested when they are not in a box and do not contain rigid inserts.</span></font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 19.5pt; text-indent: -19.5pt"><font face="Wingdings" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Wingdings">§</span></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span style="font-size: 7pt">          </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Relaxed/Clarified Definition of Uniform Thickness – now allow a variation of up to 1/4 inch in thickness, not counting selvage. </span></font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 19.5pt; text-indent: -19.5pt"><font face="Wingdings" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Wingdings">§</span></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span style="font-size: 7pt">          </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Relaxed Deflection Test – now allow pieces to droop to within 1 inch of length, up to a maximum of 4 inches, instead of 4 inches for pieces over 10 inches long and 2 inches for pieces less than 10 inches long.</span></font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10.5pt">Relaxed Standards and New Payment Option for Periodicals Container Charge</span></font></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 19.5pt; text-indent: -19.5pt"><font face="Wingdings" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Wingdings">§</span></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span style="font-size: 7pt">          </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Proposed to waive the container charge for direct carrier route, 5-digit carrier routes, and 5-digit containers of mixed Outside-County and In-County pieces.</span></font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 19.5pt; text-indent: -19.5pt"><font face="Wingdings" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Wingdings">§</span></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span style="font-size: 7pt">          </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Proposed a new option to pay the container charge by prorating it across multiple titles in a combined mailing if documentation is submitted through Mail.dat.</span></font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10.5pt">Relaxed Standards and Easier Preparation for Letters</span></font></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 19.5pt; text-indent: -19.5pt"><font face="Wingdings" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Wingdings">§</span></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span style="font-size: 7pt">          </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Allowed mailers to apply the no–overflow tray option selectively at the 3-digit and AADC tray levels.</span></font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 19.5pt; text-indent: -19.5pt"><font face="Wingdings" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Wingdings">§</span></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span style="font-size: 7pt">          </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Extended the “no bundling” standards to all automated carrier route letters, not just the letters we DPS.</span></font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10.5pt">Retained Terminology and Easier Preparation for Parcels and Not Flat-Machinable (NFM) Pieces</span></font></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 19.5pt; text-indent: -19.5pt"><font face="Wingdings" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Wingdings">§</span></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span style="font-size: 7pt">          </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Retained the “irregular” parcel terminology instead of changing it to “nonmachinable.”</span></font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 19.5pt; text-indent: -19.5pt"><font face="Wingdings" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Wingdings">§</span></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="1"><span style="font-size: 7pt">          </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Made 5-digit presorting optional for all Standard Mail parcels and NFMs.</span></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Today’s notice provides you with a second opportunity to comment on and make suggestions about our proposed mailing standards. We invite your comments on all aspects of our second proposal. Send written comments on or before January 31 to the Manager of Mailing Standards, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW Rm 3436, </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">Washington</span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt"> </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">DC</span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt"> </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">20260-3436</span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">.</span></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt">In February we will publish an additional <em><span style="font-style: italic">Federal Register</span></em> notice incorporating comments from this proposal to ensure mailers have adequate time to prepare for the new standards and prices. The updated notice will provide a comprehensive view of our proposal at least a month before the Postal Service Governors vote on the new prices and an early opportunity to update software and other systems.</span></font></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 11pt">Timeline – Domestic and International Proposals</span></font></strong></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 11pt"><img src="http://www.postalnewsblog.com/images/image001.jpg" /></span></font></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/01/17/postal-service-seeks-additional-comments-on-proposed-mailing-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
