Gamefly seeks to force USPS to disclose details of Netflix deal
In a request filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission, Gamefly, a company that rents game DVDs via the mail, seeks to compel the US Postal Service to provide information the USPS says is off-limits.
In its motion, Gamefly says:
In its objections, the Postal Service seeks to place three kinds of information offlimits to discovery: (1) information about any aspect of preferential treatment received by Netflix other than the degree of manual processing of return DVD mailers; (2) information about the treatment received by DVD rental companies—other than GameFly—that have smaller mail volume than Netflix and Blockbuster; and (3) certain information about the Netflix-only drop slots at local post offices. These restrictions are unfounded.
Gamefly points out that the USPS has already admitted that Netflix receives special treatment:
The first issue has been resolved by the Postal Service’s own statements in this case. The Postal Service initially asserted that it had abandoned its practice of giving manual culling and manual processing to “the largest movie DVD providers” in the wake of the November 2007 report of the Office of Inspector General, and specifically “denie[d] that any ‘large percentage’ of inbound movie DVDs are processed manually.” Since GameFly began discovery, however, the Postal Service has admitted that the preferential treatment given to Netflix has continued or even increased since the OIG report. The Postal Service’s August 14 response to GFL/USPS-18, for example, admits that “the amount of manual processing of Netflix mail is likely at least as large as was set forth in the [Office of Inspector General Audit] Report, though no specific percentages are available.”
The Gamefly motion concludes:
A variety of information indicates that the Postal Service’s preferential treatment of Netflix is driven primarily by a desire to cater to a large customer, and that the operational needs that supposedly justify this discrimination are pretexts.
(1) Perhaps the most telling sign is the inability of the Postal Service to keep its story straight about whether it is discriminating at all. As noted above, at the outset of this case the Postal Service represented to the Commission that the practice of giving manual culling and manual processing to “the largest movie DVD providers” had been abandoned in the wake of the November 2007 report of the Office of Inspector General.
Since then, however, the Postal Service has admitted that Netflix DVD return mailers get at least as much manual processing as in late 2007.(2) In response to GFL/USPS-28, the Postal Service asserts that dedicated mail slots for Netflix DVD mailers in “lobby drops available for the public to deposit mail” are “against current Headquarters policy, as detailed in the attached Retail Digest.” USPS response to GFL/USPS-28 (filed August 14, 2009). The attached headquarters directive states that: In an effort to accommodate Netflix mail, some offices have created special mail drops and signage for Netflix returns. This is not an
authorized use of mail drop slots and it has legal ramification [sic] for the Postal Service.The headquarters directive is an admission that this form of preferential treatment for Netflix has no operational justification; and the “legal ramification” alluded to is presumably liability for discrimination under 39 U.S.C. § 403(c).
