Archive for the 'GameFly' Category

Gamefly seeks to force USPS to disclose details of Netflix deal

netflixonlyIn a request filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission, Gamefly, a company that rents game DVDs via the mail, seeks to compel the US Postal Service to provide information the USPS says is off-limits.

In its motion, Gamefly says:

In its objections, the Postal Service seeks to place three kinds of information offlimits to discovery: (1) information about any aspect of preferential treatment received by Netflix other than the degree of manual processing of return DVD mailers; (2) information about the treatment received by DVD rental companies—other than GameFly—that have smaller mail volume than Netflix and Blockbuster; and (3) certain information about the Netflix-only drop slots at local post offices. These restrictions are unfounded.

Gamefly points out that the USPS has already admitted that Netflix receives special treatment:

The first issue has been resolved by the Postal Service’s own statements in this case. The Postal Service initially asserted that it had abandoned its practice of giving manual culling and manual processing to “the largest movie DVD providers” in the wake of the November 2007 report of the Office of Inspector General, and specifically “denie[d] that any ‘large percentage’ of inbound movie DVDs are processed manually.” Since GameFly began discovery, however, the Postal Service has admitted that the preferential treatment given to Netflix has continued or even increased since the OIG report. The Postal Service’s August 14 response to GFL/USPS-18, for example, admits that “the amount of manual processing of Netflix mail is likely at least as large as was set forth in the [Office of Inspector General Audit] Report, though no specific percentages are available.”

The Gamefly motion concludes:

A variety of information indicates that the Postal Service’s preferential treatment of Netflix is driven primarily by a desire to cater to a large customer, and that the operational needs that supposedly justify this discrimination are pretexts.

(1) Perhaps the most telling sign is the inability of the Postal Service to keep its story straight about whether it is discriminating at all. As noted above, at the outset of this case the Postal Service represented to the Commission that the practice of giving manual culling and manual processing to “the largest movie DVD providers” had been abandoned in the wake of the November 2007 report of the Office of Inspector General.
Since then, however, the Postal Service has admitted that Netflix DVD return mailers get at least as much manual processing as in late 2007.

(2) In response to GFL/USPS-28, the Postal Service asserts that dedicated mail slots for Netflix DVD mailers in “lobby drops available for the public to deposit mail” are “against current Headquarters policy, as detailed in the attached Retail Digest.” USPS response to GFL/USPS-28 (filed August 14, 2009). The attached headquarters directive states that: In an effort to accommodate Netflix mail, some offices have created special mail drops and signage for Netflix returns. This is not an
authorized use of mail drop slots and it has legal ramification [sic] for the Postal Service.

The headquarters directive is an admission that this form of preferential treatment for Netflix has no operational justification; and the “legal ramification” alluded to is presumably liability for discrimination under 39 U.S.C. § 403(c).

Gamefly: we’d like the same deal Netflix has!

In a complaint filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission, online video game rental service Gamefly accuses the US Postal Service of providing preferential treatment to Netflix and Blockbuster. The company says that its DVD’s are being damaged at an unacceptable rate despite the fact that the mailer has agreed to use sturdier mailers, and as a result pays higher postage fees per piece than the other companies. (The company also notes that a significant number of its DVDs are stolen- 19 postal employees have been arrested for stealing GameFly DVDs).

In addition, the company points out that Netflix mailers are routinely processed manually:

GameFly is not the only mailer to experience significant DVD breakage rates on automated mail processing equipment. In response to this phenomenon, the Postal Service has adopted a practice of manually culling out the DVD mailers of two high-volume shippers of DVDs, Netflix and Blockbuster, for special processing.

A report by the Postal Service’s Office of Inspector General in November 2007 found that 70 percent of the two-way DVD mailers from one unnamed DVD rental company received manual processing for this reason. USPS Office of Inspector General, Audit Report No. MS-AR-08-001, Review of Postal Service First-Class Permit Reply Mail (November 8, 2007).

The Postal Service’s practice of giving manual processing to DVDs from certain large mailers has continued since the OIG report. On routine visits to multiple Postal Service facilities, GameFly’s employees have observed that a large percentage of mail pieces from Netflix and Blockbuster are culled from the automated letter processing stream.

GameFly has asked the Postal Service to give GameFly’s DVD mailers processing on terms and conditions comparable to the terms and conditions offered to two larger DVD mailers, Blockbuster and Netflix. The Postal Service has not done so.

The issue has taken on additional urgency for GameFly because of Blockbuster’s entry into the game rental market:

Until recently, none of the larger-volume DVD rental companies offered video games. On February 11, 2009, however, Blockbuster, which hitherto had offered only movie DVDs (which GameFly does not offer), announced that Blockbuster was expanding its DVD rental service to include video games in the second quarter of 2009.

As a result of this initiative, GameFly now faces direct competition from a rival that is larger and longer established—and which, because of the preferential treatment given by the Postal Service, enjoys a substantial cost advantage in the distribution of its DVDs to consumers.

The company says it has attempted to work out an agreement with the Postal Service, but that the USPS has ignored its requests to discuss the issue.