<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>postalnews blog &#187; payroll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalnewsblog.com/category/payroll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com</link>
	<description>more from postalnews.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rural pay snafu?</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/12/14/rural-pay-snafu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/12/14/rural-pay-snafu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural carriers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/12/14/rural-pay-snafu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a reader:
Just thought I&#8217;d mention that I was surprised not to find info on the rural carrier pay snafu that will leave up to 14,000 rural carriers without a paycheck. Oh,  they are offering to pay 65% of your gross salary in the form of a postal money order, but not including ema [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a reader:</p>
<blockquote><p>Just thought I&#8217;d mention that I was surprised not to find info on the rural carrier pay snafu that will leave up to 14,000 rural carriers without a paycheck. Oh,  they are offering to pay 65% of your gross salary in the form of a postal money order, but not including ema for those of us that drive our own vehicles. Just in time to be the grinch that stole Christmas. What a mess and a nightmare!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2007/12/14/rural-pay-snafu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postal Payroll</title>
		<link>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/02/07/postal-payroll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/02/07/postal-payroll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal finances]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/02/07/postal-payroll/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The periodic reports posted on the Postal Rate Commission web site may not be everyone&#8217;s idea of a fun read, but they&#8217;re full of interesting numbers when you poke around in them. Today brings a sheaf of payroll reports- itemizing in mind-numbing detail (1,408 pages to be exact) what the USPS has paid out to its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The periodic reports posted on the Postal Rate Commission web site may not be everyone&#8217;s idea of a fun read, but they&#8217;re full of interesting numbers when you poke around in them. Today brings <a href="http://www.prc.gov/show_document.asp?docid=47793" target="_blank">a sheaf of payroll reports</a>- itemizing in mind-numbing detail (1,408 pages to be exact) what the USPS has paid out to its employees in the first 16 weeks of the fiscal year. If you&#8217;re thinking that maybe you&#8217;ll skip reading the whole thing just now, here are some of the interesting numbers:<span id="more-18"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>A billion dollars a week: the average postal payroll so far this year, totalling salaries and benefits for all employees.</li>
<li>$2.3 Billion: the amount spent so far on retirement funding, including the employer contribution to CSRS and FERS pensions, Social Security, Medicare and Thrift Savings.</li>
<li>$1.4 Billion: that&#8217;s how much has been paid out so far on health benefits. (That&#8217;s more than has been spent so far on the hourly wages of Mail Handlers or Rural Letter Carriers.)</li>
<li>$1.5 Billion: total cost of overtime, or just under $100 million a week. The average overtime rate is $32.96 an hour.</li>
<li>13%: the average overtime percentage (OT/total hours) for bargaining unit employees. The rate varies widely by employee type- for clerks it&#8217;s 13%, for city carriers 15%, for mailhandlers 19%, while rural carriers (paid on an evaluated system) get less than 3% overtime.</li>
<li>$13.67/hour: the average hourly wage paid to casual or temporary employees, including Postmaster and Rural Carrier reliefs.</li>
<li>$405 million: the amount paid out in sick leave for the first 16 weeks. The total sick leave rate was just under 4%. Bargaining unit sick leave was 4.4%. Management employees nationwide had a sick leave rate of 3.3%, but the Headquarters non-bargaining sick leave rate was 4.5%.</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.prc.gov/docs/47/47793/bb0206.pdf">National Payroll Hours Summary Report for Pay Period 02 FY 2006</a> (That&#8217;s the pay period ending January 20, 2006- figures cited are fiscal year to date.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/02/07/postal-payroll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
